Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 32(5): 432-439, oct. 2019. ilus, tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-188709

RESUMO

OBJETIVOS: Describir el tipo de vacunas administradas en la Unidad de Vacunas de un hospital de referencia y calcular la tasa de notificación global y específica de las reacciones adversas asociadas. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, realizado en el periodo entre noviembre de 2014 y noviembre de 2017, de los pacientes que desarrollaron una reacción adversa a medicamento (RAM) tras la administración de una vacuna y que fue notificada al Sistema Español de Farmacovigilancia. Las variables analizadas fueron edad, sexo, grupo de riesgo, tipo de vacuna, coadministración y tipo de RAM. Se llevó a cabo un análisis univariante y bivariante. Se calculó la tasa de notificación de RAM global y específica para cada vacuna. RESULTADOS: Se administraron un total de 18.123 vacunas de las que el 20,7% correspondían a la vacuna frente al virus de la hepatitis B. Se notificaron 53 sospechas de RAM. En el 64,2% de las ocasiones se había administrado solamente una vacuna. El 88,7% de las notificaciones correspondieron a vacunas inactivadas. La vacuna frente neumococo polisacárida de 23 serotipos fue la que generó el mayor número de notificaciones. La tasa de notificación global de RAM fue de 0,42%. La vacuna hexavalente fue la que registró la tasa de notificación más elevada (2,81%). El 49,1% de las RAM fueron de tipo sistémico. CONCLUSIONES: La tasa de notificación global fue baja aunque superior a la registrada por otros autores. La correcta notificación de posibles reacciones adversas postvacunales es imprescindible para contribuir a la seguridad vacunal y para aumentar la confianza de la población en las vacunas


OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to describe the type of vaccines administered in the Vaccine Unit at a reference hospital. Calculate the overall and specific reporting rate of adverse reactions. METHODS: Retrospective observational study for the period between November 2014 and November 2017, on patients who developed an adverse drug reaction (ADR) after the administration of a vaccine and who were notified to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System. The variables analyzed were age, sex, risk group, vaccine class, co-administration and type of ADR. A univariate and bivariate analysis was performed. The global and vaccine specific rate of ADR notification was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 18,123 vaccines were administered, of which 20.7% corresponded to hepatitis B virus vaccine. Fifty-three RAM suspects were reported. In 64.2% of cases only one vaccine was administered. Inactivated vaccines accounted for 88.7% of notifications. The highest number of notifications was generated by the 23 serotypes pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. The overall reporting rate was 0.42%. The hexavalent vaccine had the highest reporting rate (2.81%).49.1% of the ADR were systemic. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reporting rate was low but higher than that of other authors. Proper reporting of possible adverse post-vaccine reactions is essential to contribute to vaccine safety and to increase public confidence in vaccines


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Farmacovigilância , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/efeitos adversos , Análise de Variância , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos
3.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 75(8): 1161-1176, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31065742

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In the last decades, different criteria have been developed for detecting inappropriate prescription in older patients. In Spain, translations and adaptations of international lists are available but it would be necessary a national list which could cope with the peculiarities of our health system, existing pharmaceutical market, and prescription habits. We propose in this project the creation of a Spanish potentially inappropriate drugs list which could be applicable in our clinical scenario. METHODS: We use a Delphi method involving 25 experts from different backgrounds (Clinical Pharmacology, Geriatrics, Rational Use of Drugs and Pharmacy, Primary Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, and Pharmacovigilance) that were asked to participate in two-round questionnaires. For analysis, current recommendations of Worth and Pigni were applied, and every statement was classified into one of three groups: strong, moderate, or low agreement. Statements with strong agreement were accepted to be part of the inadequate prescription list. Moderate agreement statements were selected to enter the second questionnaire, and statements with low agreement were further analyzed to determine if it was due to heterogeneity or due to dispersion in the answers. RESULTS: The first questionnaire consisted of 160 proposed sentences, of which 106 reached a high agreement, 32 a moderate agreement, and 22 a low agreement. All sentences proposed in the second questionnaire reached a strong agreement. The total accepted sentences were 138. CONCLUSIONS: We offer a list of inadequate prescription in older patients adapted to the Spanish pharmacopeia and according to the prescription habits in our environment.


Assuntos
Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Técnica Delfos , Humanos , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 32(2): 178-182, abr. 2019. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-182819

RESUMO

Objetivos: Describir las características clínico-epidemiológicas en una serie de casos de sospecha de reacciones adversas sistémicas registradas tras la administración de la vacuna frente a neumococo polisacárida de 23 serotipos (PNEUMOVAX23(R)). Calcular la incidencia acumulada de dicha reacción y conocer si se han descrito casos similares y/o compatibles en la literatura científica o en Farmacovigilancia. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo realizado entre 01/12/2015 y 30/09/2017 en la Unidad de Vacunas de un hospital autonómico de referencia. Se calculó la incidencia acumulada de la reacción adversa sistémica para esa vacuna. Se consultó la base de datos del Sistema Español de Farmacovigilancia (FEDRA). Resultados: Se registraron 9 sospechas de reacciones adversas sistémicas inmediatas (flushing + broncoespasmo + SatO2<95%). La incidencia acumulada fue 1,036%. El desenlace fue recuperado/resuelto para todos. No se encontraron casos similares y/o compatibles. Conclusiones: Las reacciones descritas no constan en la ficha técnica de PNEUMOVAX23(R). Epidemiológicamente no se puede establecer ninguna relación causal entre la aparición de los síntomas y las variables estudiadas. Esta información podría ser la base de investigaciones más amplias que supusieran la posible modificación de la ficha técnica


Objectives: To describe the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of a series of suspected systemic adverse reactions registered with the 23 serotype pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PNEUMOVAX23(R)). Calculate the cumulative incidence of the reaction and know if similar and/or compatible cases have been described in the scientific literature or in pharmacovigilance. Methods: Observational and retrospective study realized between 01/12/2015 and 30/09/2017 in the Vaccines Unit of an autonomic reference hospital. We calculated the cumulative incidence of the adverse reaction for that vaccine. The common pharmacovigilance database (FEDRA) was consulted. Results: Nine systemic adverse reactions were recorded (flushing + bronchospasm + SatO2<95%). The cumulative incidence was 1.036%. The outcome was recovered/resolved for everyone. No similar and/or compatible cases were found. Conclusions: The reactions described do not appear in the PNEUMOVAX23(R) data sheet. Epidemiologically, no causal relationship can be established between the symptoms and the variables studied. This study could be the basis for more detailed research that could modify the vaccine data sheet


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Múltiplas Afecções Crônicas/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/efeitos adversos , Espasmo Brônquico/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Farmacovigilância , Rubor/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...